This is a necessary prerequisite for debugging with modules.
The .pcm files become containers that hold the serialized AST which allows
us to store debug information in the module file that can be shared by all
object files that were built importing the module.

This reapplies r230044 with a fixed configure+make build and updated
dependencies and testcase requirements. Over the last iteration this
version adds
- missing target requirements for testcases that specify an x86 triple,
- a missing clangCodeGen.a dependency to libClang.a in the make build.

rdar://problem/19104245

llvm-svn: 230423

llvm-svn: 230422

Some of these tests fail on Darwin systems because of a lack of a triple;
fix that.

llvm-svn: 230421

llvm-svn: 230420

llvm-svn: 230419

llvm-svn: 230418

constructor.

llvm-svn: 230417

Since r199356, we've printed a warning when dropping debug info.
r225562 started crashing on that, since it registered a diagnostic
handler that only expected errors.  This fixes the handler to expect
other severities.  As a side effect, it now prints "error: " at the
start of error messages, similar to `llvm-as`.

There was a testcase for r199356, but it only really checked the
assembler.  Move `test/Bitcode/drop-debug-info.ll` to `test/Assembler`,
and introduce `test/Bitcode/drop-debug-info.3.5.ll` (and companion
`.bc`) to test the bitcode reader.

Note: tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp has an equivalent bug, but I'm not sure
what the best fix is there.  I'll file a PR.

llvm-svn: 230416

Like r230414, add bitcode support including backwards compatibility, for
an explicit type parameter to GEP.

At the suggestion of Duncan I tried coalescing the two older bitcodes into a
single new bitcode, though I did hit a wrinkle: I couldn't figure out how to
create an explicit abbreviation for a record with a variable number of
arguments (the indicies to the gep). This means the discriminator between
inbounds and non-inbounds gep is a full variable-length field I believe? Is my
understanding correct? Is there a way to create such an abbreviation? Should I
just use two bitcodes as before?

Reviewers: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7736

llvm-svn: 230415

Summary:
I've taken my best guess at this, but I've cargo culted in places & so
explanations/corrections would be great.

This seems to pass all the tests (check-all, covering clang and llvm) so I
believe that pretty well exercises both the backwards compatibility and common
(same version) compatibility given the number of checked in bitcode files we
already have. Is that a reasonable approach to testing here? Would some more
explicit tests be desired?

1) is this the right way to do back-compat in this case (looking at the number
  of entries in the bitcode record to disambiguate between the old schema and
  the new?)

2) I don't quite understand the logarithm logic to choose the encoding type of
  the type parameter in the abbreviation description, but I found another
  instruction doing the same thing & it seems to work. Is that the right
  approach?

Reviewers: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7655

llvm-svn: 230414

This adds support for the QPX vector instruction set, which is used by the
enhanced A2 cores on the IBM BG/Q supercomputers. QPX vectors are 256 bytes
wide, holding 4 double-precision floating-point values. Boolean values, modeled
here as <4 x i1> are actually also represented as floating-point values
(essentially  { -1, 1 } for { false, true }). QPX shares many features with
Altivec and VSX, but is distinct from both of them. One major difference is
that, instead of adding completely-separate vector registers, QPX vector
registers are extensions of the scalar floating-point registers (lane 0 is the
corresponding scalar floating-point value). The operations supported on QPX
vectors mirrors that supported on the scalar floating-point values (with some
additional ones for permutations and logical/comparison operations).

I've been maintaining this support out-of-tree, as part of the bgclang project,
for several years. This is not the entire bgclang patch set, but is most of the
subset that can be cleanly integrated into LLVM proper at this time. Adding
this to the LLVM backend is part of my efforts to rebase bgclang to the current
LLVM trunk, but is independently useful (especially for codes that use LLVM as
a JIT in library form).

The assembler/disassembler test coverage is complete. The CodeGen test coverage
is not, but I've included some tests, and more will be added as follow-up work.

llvm-svn: 230413

graph with M modules to take O(P) time, not just O(M) time, when using explicit
module builds.

llvm-svn: 230412

This patch unifies the comdat and non-comdat code paths. By doing this
it add missing features to the comdat side and removes the fixed
section assumptions from the non-comdat side.

In ELF there is no one true section for "4 byte mergeable" constants.
We are better off computing the required properties of the section
and asking the context for it.

llvm-svn: 230411

Suggested by Duncan. Happy to bikeshed the name, cache the result, etc.

llvm-svn: 230410

llvm-svn: 230409

If you try to auto-complete "target symbols<TAB>" you get "target symbolsadd" instead of "target symbols ".

Fix this by returning the fact that the "symbols" word is complete if there is nothing else to complete after the "symbols" word.

<rdar://problem/19164599>

llvm-svn: 230408

I'd been using '' where I should have been using ``.

llvm-svn: 230407

It crashes for targeting (i686|x86_64)-win32.

  clang: clang/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp:142: {anonymous}::FinalOverriders::OverriderInfo {anonymous}::FinalOverriders::getOverrider(const clang::CXXMethodDecl*, clang::CharUnits) const: Assertion `OverridersMap.count(std::make_pair(MD, BaseOffset)) && "Did not find overrider!"' failed.

llvm-svn: 230406

Also, fix confusing bit of the gcroot documentation that bit me personally.

llvm-svn: 230405

llvm-svn: 230404

Fixing an issue pointed out by Sean Silva.  Thanks!

llvm-svn: 230403

llvm-svn: 230402

"After recent changes, some code has become redundant. This revision tries to remove
the un-used code and tidy up the rest.

Following 4 files have been removed. I have updated CMake files and checked that it builds
fine on Linux and Windows. Can somebody update the xcode related file accordingly?

tools/lldb-mi/MICmnStreamStdinLinux.cpp
tools/lldb-mi/MICmnStreamStdinLinux.h
tools/lldb-mi/MICmnStreamStdinWindows.cpp
tools/lldb-mi/MICmnStreamStdinWindows.h"

llvm-svn: 230401

was some flexibility in the check line for the comment basic block.

llvm-svn: 230400

It was maintaining two huge file lists that are identical except
for 1 file.  Make this work the proper way.

llvm-svn: 230398

Mostly minor wording changes for readability.  Nothing major to see here.

llvm-svn: 230397

When you use generator expressions in a library sources list,
and then later access the SOURCES property, the OLD behavior
(CMake 3.0 and earlier) would not include these expressions in
the SOURCES property.  The NEW behavior (starting in CMake 3.1)
is that they do include the generator expressions in the SOURCES
property.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7870
Reviewed By: Chris Bieneman

llvm-svn: 230396

Commit of patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D7871

llvm-svn: 230395

The builder is based on a layout algorithm that tries to keep members of
small bit sets together. The new layout compresses Chromium's bit sets to
around 15% of their original size.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7796

llvm-svn: 230394

This is still gcroot vs gc.statepoint agnostic.  I'm just trying to clarify the general documentation at this point.

llvm-svn: 230393

There is no need to open-code the alignment calculation, we have a
handy RoundUpToAlignment function which "Does The Right Thing (TM)".

llvm-svn: 230392

llvm-svn: 230391

llvm-svn: 230390

This resubmits r230380.  The primary cause of the failure was
actually just a warning, which we can disable at the CMake level
in a followup patch on the LLVM side.  The other thing which was
actually an error on the bot should be able to be fixed with
a clean.

llvm-svn: 230389

Reapplied D7816 & rL230177 & rL230278 - with an additional fix toensure that the smallest build vector input scalar type is always used. Additional (crash) test cases already committed.

llvm-svn: 230388

Most of the checks in these two tests were actually testing the
behaviour of the instrprof LLVM pass. Now that we're testing that
specifically in LLVM's test suite, it's better if we only test the
frontend's behaviour here.

llvm-svn: 230387

Added test case for PR22678 (check CONCAT_VECTORS DAG combiner pass doesn't introduce illegal types)

llvm-svn: 230386

Commiting code from review http://reviews.llvm.org/D7841

llvm-svn: 230385

wrong (DiagnoseUseOfDecl should take both), but it's more consistent with what
we do in other places.

llvm-svn: 230384

This test checks that the symbols instrprof creates have appropriate
linkage. The tests already exist in clang in a slightly different form
from before we sunk profile generation into an LLVM pass, but that's
an awkward place for them now. I'll remove/simplify the clang versions
shortly.

llvm-svn: 230383