提交 115c9113 编辑于 作者: Akanksha Mahajan's avatar Akanksha Mahajan 提交者: Andrew Kryczka
浏览文件

Update Flush policy in PartitionedIndexBuilder on switching from user-key to...

Update Flush policy in PartitionedIndexBuilder on switching from user-key to internal-key mode (#7096)

Summary:
When format_version is high enough to support user-key and
there are index entries for same user key that spans multiple data
blocks then it changes from user-key mode to internal-key mode. But the
flush policy is not reset to point to Block Builder of internal-keys.
After this switch, no entries are added to user key index partition
result, thus it never triggers flushing the block.

Fix: 1. After adding the entry in sub_builder_index_, if there is a switch
from user-key to internal-key, then flush policy is updated to point to
Block Builder of internal-keys index partition.
2. Set sub_builder_index_->seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ = true if
seperator_is_key_plus_seq_  is set to true so that subsequent partitions
can also use internal key mode.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/7096

Test Plan: make check -j64

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D22416598

Pulled By: akankshamahajan15

fbshipit-source-id: 01fc2dc07ea1b32f8fb803995ebe6e9a3fbe67ac
上级 07e2ca10
# Rocksdb Change Log
## 6.11.3 (7/9/2020)
### Bug Fixes
* Fix a bug when index_type == kTwoLevelIndexSearch in PartitionedIndexBuilder to update FlushPolicy to point to internal key partitioner when it changes from user-key mode to internal-key mode in index partition.
## 6.11.1 (6/23/2020)
### Bug Fixes
* Best-efforts recovery ignores CURRENT file completely. If CURRENT file is missing during recovery, best-efforts recovery still proceeds with MANIFEST file(s).
......
......@@ -144,6 +144,38 @@ INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(TestReadOnlyWithCompressedCache,
TestReadOnlyWithCompressedCache,
::testing::Combine(::testing::Values(-1, 100),
::testing::Bool()));
class PartitionedIndexTestListener : public EventListener {
public:
void OnFlushCompleted(DB* /*db*/, const FlushJobInfo& info) override {
ASSERT_GT(info.table_properties.index_partitions, 1);
ASSERT_EQ(info.table_properties.index_key_is_user_key, 0);
}
};
TEST_F(DBTest2, PartitionedIndexUserToInternalKey) {
BlockBasedTableOptions table_options;
Options options = CurrentOptions();
table_options.index_type = BlockBasedTableOptions::kTwoLevelIndexSearch;
PartitionedIndexTestListener* listener = new PartitionedIndexTestListener();
options.table_factory.reset(NewBlockBasedTableFactory(table_options));
options.listeners.emplace_back(listener);
std::vector<const Snapshot*> snapshots;
Reopen(options);
Random rnd(301);
for (int i = 0; i < 3000; i++) {
int j = i % 30;
std::string value = RandomString(&rnd, 10500);
ASSERT_OK(Put("keykey_" + std::to_string(j), value));
snapshots.push_back(db_->GetSnapshot());
}
Flush();
for (auto s : snapshots) {
db_->ReleaseSnapshot(s);
}
}
#endif // ROCKSDB_LITE
class PrefixFullBloomWithReverseComparator
......
......@@ -104,6 +104,15 @@ void PartitionedIndexBuilder::MakeNewSubIndexBuilder() {
comparator_, table_opt_.index_block_restart_interval,
table_opt_.format_version, use_value_delta_encoding_,
table_opt_.index_shortening, /* include_first_key */ false);
// Set sub_index_builder_->seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ to true if
// seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ is true (internal-key mode) (set to false by
// default on Creation) so that flush policy can point to
// sub_index_builder_->index_block_builder_
if (seperator_is_key_plus_seq_) {
sub_index_builder_->seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ = true;
}
flush_policy_.reset(FlushBlockBySizePolicyFactory::NewFlushBlockPolicy(
table_opt_.metadata_block_size, table_opt_.block_size_deviation,
// Note: this is sub-optimal since sub_index_builder_ could later reset
......@@ -129,9 +138,15 @@ void PartitionedIndexBuilder::AddIndexEntry(
}
sub_index_builder_->AddIndexEntry(last_key_in_current_block,
first_key_in_next_block, block_handle);
if (sub_index_builder_->seperator_is_key_plus_seq_) {
// then we need to apply it to all sub-index builders
if (!seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ &&
sub_index_builder_->seperator_is_key_plus_seq_) {
// then we need to apply it to all sub-index builders and reset
// flush_policy to point to Block Builder of sub_index_builder_ that store
// internal keys.
seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ = true;
flush_policy_.reset(FlushBlockBySizePolicyFactory::NewFlushBlockPolicy(
table_opt_.metadata_block_size, table_opt_.block_size_deviation,
sub_index_builder_->index_block_builder_));
}
sub_index_last_key_ = std::string(*last_key_in_current_block);
entries_.push_back(
......@@ -161,9 +176,15 @@ void PartitionedIndexBuilder::AddIndexEntry(
sub_index_builder_->AddIndexEntry(last_key_in_current_block,
first_key_in_next_block, block_handle);
sub_index_last_key_ = std::string(*last_key_in_current_block);
if (sub_index_builder_->seperator_is_key_plus_seq_) {
// then we need to apply it to all sub-index builders
if (!seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ &&
sub_index_builder_->seperator_is_key_plus_seq_) {
// then we need to apply it to all sub-index builders and reset
// flush_policy to point to Block Builder of sub_index_builder_ that store
// internal keys.
seperator_is_key_plus_seq_ = true;
flush_policy_.reset(FlushBlockBySizePolicyFactory::NewFlushBlockPolicy(
table_opt_.metadata_block_size, table_opt_.block_size_deviation,
sub_index_builder_->index_block_builder_));
}
}
}
......
Supports Markdown
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册