Commit 0645e8b4 authored by Yi Wu's avatar Yi Wu
Browse files

Fix win build

Summary: Fixing error with win build where we compare int64_t with size_t.

Test Plan: make check

Reviewers: andrewkr

Reviewed By: andrewkr

Subscribers: andrewkr, dhruba, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D57885
parent 6504c31c
......@@ -1566,7 +1566,7 @@ TEST_F(DBIteratorTest, ReadAhead) {
auto* iter = db_->NewIterator(read_options);
iter->SeekToFirst();
int64_t num_file_opens = TestGetTickerCount(options, NO_FILE_OPENS);
int64_t bytes_read = env_->random_read_bytes_counter_;
size_t bytes_read = env_->random_read_bytes_counter_;
delete iter;
env_->random_read_bytes_counter_ = 0;
......@@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@ TEST_F(DBIteratorTest, ReadAhead) {
iter = db_->NewIterator(read_options);
iter->SeekToFirst();
int64_t num_file_opens_readahead = TestGetTickerCount(options, NO_FILE_OPENS);
int64_t bytes_read_readahead = env_->random_read_bytes_counter_;
size_t bytes_read_readahead = env_->random_read_bytes_counter_;
delete iter;
ASSERT_EQ(num_file_opens + 3, num_file_opens_readahead);
ASSERT_GT(bytes_read_readahead, bytes_read);
......
......@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ class SpecialEnv : public EnvWrapper {
public:
CountingFile(unique_ptr<RandomAccessFile>&& target,
anon::AtomicCounter* counter,
std::atomic<int64_t>* bytes_read)
std::atomic<size_t>* bytes_read)
: target_(std::move(target)),
counter_(counter),
bytes_read_(bytes_read) {}
......@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ class SpecialEnv : public EnvWrapper {
private:
unique_ptr<RandomAccessFile> target_;
anon::AtomicCounter* counter_;
std::atomic<int64_t>* bytes_read_;
std::atomic<size_t>* bytes_read_;
};
Status s = target()->NewRandomAccessFile(f, r, soptions);
......@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ class SpecialEnv : public EnvWrapper {
bool count_random_reads_;
anon::AtomicCounter random_read_counter_;
std::atomic<int64_t> random_read_bytes_counter_;
std::atomic<size_t> random_read_bytes_counter_;
std::atomic<int> random_file_open_counter_;
bool count_sequential_reads_;
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment