This project is mirrored from https://github.com/google/riscv-dv.git. Pull mirroring failed .
Last successful update .
  1. 03 12月, 2021 2 次提交
    • weicaiyang's avatar
      Merge pull request #834 from vogelpi/allow-bitmanip-v.1.00-and-v.0.93 · ea8dd251
      weicaiyang 创作于
      Upgrade bitmanip v.0.92 to v.0.93, enable simultaneous use with v.1.00
      ea8dd251
    • Pirmin Vogel's avatar
      Upgrade bitmanip v.0.92 to v.0.93, enable simultaneous use with v.1.00 · 3fb3cec0
      Pirmin Vogel 创作于
      
      
      The main changes implemented by this PR are:
      1. Support for bitmanip draft v.0.92 is dropped.
      2. Remaining bitmanip instructions not ratified as part of v.1.00 of
         the bitmanip spec are upgraded to the latest draft (v.0.93).
      3. Simultaneous use of the v.1.00 bitmanip instructions and those
         instructions only part of draft v.0.93 is enabled.
      4. Rename bext/bdep to bcompress/bdecompress. This is part of v.0.94.
         But it's needed as in v.0.93 as well as in v.1.00 sbext from Zbs
         is renamed to bext, leading to two completely different instructions
         having the same name.
      5. Increase the MAX_INSTR_STR_LEN parameter to accomodate longer
         instruction names (bdecompressw has 12 characters).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPirmin Vogel <vogelpi@lowrisc.org>
      3fb3cec0
  2. 30 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 16 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  4. 28 10月, 2021 3 次提交
  5. 19 10月, 2021 1 次提交
  6. 17 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 16 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  8. 14 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 02 9月, 2021 4 次提交
  10. 17 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 05 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  12. 29 7月, 2021 2 次提交
  13. 20 7月, 2021 5 次提交
  14. 26 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  15. 28 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  16. 10 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  17. 02 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  18. 24 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  19. 22 3月, 2021 2 次提交
  20. 09 3月, 2021 1 次提交
    • Rupert Swarbrick's avatar
      [questa] Remove -access=rwc from vlog command line arguments · 51ddfc1e
      Rupert Swarbrick 创作于
      This doesn't seem to be supported by at least Questa 2020.03 (see
      issue #780). I don't have a Questa licence or manual locally, but it
      looks like this is an Xcelium flag. Maybe it was supported by other
      Questa versions as a compatibility shim? If we need to allow the
      equivalent access, I think the argument is "+acc", but I'm not
      convinced it's needed at all, so suggest removing it entirely.
      51ddfc1e
  21. 05 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  22. 04 3月, 2021 3 次提交
  23. 23 2月, 2021 4 次提交